Every attempt has been made to ensure accuracy; please independently verify all data.
Published on: 02 Jul 2014
Updated: 15 Sep 2016
Surname variations: McCall, MacKall, Mycall
Clan McCall Caithness on Facebook
The following information was submitted by: Ray Rolla McCall, Esq., Captain & Armiger of Clan McCall (Caithness), Project Admin of the McCall Caithness Geographic DNA Project and Suzanne Wood.
“James and Robert MacKall fled the Highlands due to non-conformity to the Roman Catholic [Church]. They fled to their ancestral homeland of Ulster Ireland, where Clan MacKall lived before the 5th century. When the King was planning on retaking his throne he asked his people to rally to him. Loyal Subjects they were and they returned to serve as Captains in the King’s Lyfe Guard of Foote. They served under Sir Colonel Alexander Stewart (the King’s cousin). During the battle the retreat was sounded and Sir Colonel Alexander Stewart ordered his own company to protect the retreat. At that time Captains James and Robert MacKall, declared “ad ultimum” (to the last). Both of their companies fought, bled, and died in place. Ad Ultimum has been our Clan war cry ever since. Our clan now thrives in America. We have been soldiers, politicians, governors, and farmers. We are proud to be Americans and very proud of our heritage.
James McCall was the Grandson of Baron James MacKall of Caithness. His Coat of Arms has been lost, but a new grant was given to Capt. James MacKall’s 3rd-Great-Grandson Ebenezer MacKall.
(Prisoner) Capt. James MacKallroy, married Mary Farr, granddaughter of “Old” Farr of the Mayflower Colony.
James MacKall II, married Anna Winter
James MacKall III, married 2nd wife Hannah Green/Greene”
Suzanne Wood’s source notes for James McCall:
History of Braintree 1640 to 1793, Edited by Samuel Bates, pg 716: “James Mycall and Mary Farr were married the 10th. mo.11th. 1657 by Major Autherton of Dorchester”
This marriage record also appears in Torrey’s New England Marriages, Vol II, pg 1034
History of Braintree 1640 to 1793, Edited by Samuel Bates, pg 818: 12 mo. 10. 1658 “James & Rebecca son & daughter of James Mycall & Mary born”
History of Braintree 1640 to 1793, Edited by Samuel Bates, pg 717: “Joseph Niles and Mary Mycall were married the 9th. mo. 15, 1661, by Peter Brackett
I have not found a death record for James McCall.
Following are my own notes in My Family Tree software program. Not sure what my sources were for this – I wasn’t very good about sources when I first started research many years ago.
James came to America aboard the ship “Unity” as a prisoner of war. He was taken prisoner at the “Battle of Dunbar” (Scotland) in 1650. After the battle, the prisoners who were not paroled were sent to “the colonies”. Some went to the West Indies, some to Virginia and some to Massachusetts and Maine.
Apparently Cromwell thought of them as “bitter Highlanders” (Captain John McCall, 1726-1812: His Ancestors and Descendants” by Clare M. McCall). Sixty-two of these prisoners, including our James McCall (MacKall, Micall, Mycall), were sent to work at the Saugus and Braintree ironworks.
Other sources I have consulted:
ScotWars.com -The Battle of Dunbar
Scots for Sale – New England Ancestors Magazine – Winter, 2003
The Battle of Dunbar by Steve Beck – found online somewhere – don’t remember where
The Battle of Dunbar by Dennis Bell – found online somewhere – don’t remember where
Researching Scottish Ancestors by David Curtis Dearborn, F.A.S.G. (Transcribed by Eleanor V. Spiller from a lecture to the Essex Society of Genealogists on 21 Sept. 1985
The Saugus Iron Works at Saugus, Massachusetts
The Scots at Hammersmith
by Steven Carlson
Among the many employees of the company of undertakers of the iron works in New England where a group of Scots as prisoners in the English civil war and sold to the colonies as indentured servants. Only a few learned one of the skilled trades needed by industrial complexes at Lynn and Braintree, but all eventually became members of the New England community to which they had been involuntary introduced.
On September 4, 1650, the English Parliamentary forces under Oliver Cromwell defeated the army of King Charles 11 and the Scottish Parliament under Lieutenant General David Leslie at Dunbar, on the east coast of Scotland. In the fierce fighting some 3000 Scots died, and about 9000 were taken prisoner. The English immediately released 5100 men because they were wounded and felt to be “disabled for future Service.” The remaining prisoners were sent first to Newcastle and then to Durham, under the common of Sir Arthur Haselrigge. During the course of their removal and confinement over 1600 prisoners died, “and few of any other Disease than the Flux,” or dysentery, caused by the poor conditions to which they had been subjected.
The disposition of such a large number of prisoners presented the English authorities with a dilemma: to maintain them as prisoners would prove costly, and to release them could prove dangerous to the security of the Commonwealth. One week after the battle the Council of State, England’s governing body, referred the problem to a committee and informed Haselrigge that he could dispose of as many prisoners as he felt proper for work in the coal mines. Under that authority Haselrigge sent forty men to work as indentured servants at the salt works at Shields, sold an additional forty as general laborers, and set up “a trade of Linen Cloth: with twelve prisoners as weavers.
In the meantime, the Council had received several petitions from individuals who desired to transport the Scots overseas as indentured servants. On September 16 it directed its secretary, Gualter Frost, to confer with the petitioners as to the terms under which they would undertake the project. Two of the men with whom Frost talked were among his partners in the Company of Undertakers of the Iron Works in New England, John Becx and Joshua Foote. Three days later the Council directed Haselrigge to deliver 150 prisoners to Becx and Foote for shipment to New England.
Becx and Foote specified that the prisoners selected be “well and sound, and free from wounds.” Since Haselrigge feared that although seemingly healthy “they are all infected,” the Scots were shipped to London by water. By October 23, when the Council ordered the project stopped “until assurance be given of their not being carried where they may be dangerous, ” the Scots were awaiting passage to America in the Thames. On November 11 the Council, which had exempted the New England shipment from its earlier order “as their ship is ready and the place is without danger,” issued sailing orders to the master of the Unity, on which the Scots were embarked, after receiving reports concerning “the ill-usage of the Scotch prisoners now on board as ship.” Augustine Walker probably weighed anchor immediately upon receiving those orders.
The voyage from London to Boston normally took six weeks, and most likely was an unpleasant experience for the Scots. While the dimensions of the Unity are unknown, the accommodations that it afforded the Scots would have been far from spacious. Commanded by Augustine Walker, who had settled at Charlestown in 1640, the Unity had been built at Boston around 1646 by shipwright Benjamin Gillam and regularly engaged in trade with England. No list of the Scots has survived, making the determination of how many died during the passage impossible, although a death rate approaching ten percent would not have been unreasonable given the crowded conditions and their general state after two months of confinement in England.
Becx and Foote had taken on the Scots as a commercial venture, since the twenty to thirty pounds for which the men could be sold would more than cover the approximately five pounds per man expense involved. The majority of them, however, were consigned to two businesses in which John Becx had a major interest. From fifteen to twenty-five went to Richard Leader for service at his sawmill on the piscataqua River in Maine, while sixty-two went to John Giffard, the agent for the undertakers of the iron works, at Lynn. The remainder of the servants were sold to local residents. Like other indentured servants, the Scot’s term of service was seven years.
Exactly when they reached the Lynn plant is unknown, but Giffard’s books record the initial payments for the Scot’s food in April 1651. They came from Boston by boat, and arrived in poor health, as payments for medicine and medical assistance attest. Indeed, one person by the name of Davidson died. But all of the sixty-one men remaining stayed at the iron works. Seventeen were returned to Boston to work for William Awbrey, the company’s factor, in the warehouse he maintained there. Three went to the company’s local commissioners, and at least two and possibly as many as seven were sold to other colonists.
While the number of Scots stayed at twenty-eight through at least August of the following year, it had risen to thirty-seven by September 1653. As the latter figure represented the number of men indentured to the company, while the former dealth only with those fed by it, the difference is in accounting procedures rather than the actual number of Scots. Some had been rented to iron works employees, who subsequently had to pay the cost of their food, clothing and shelter. In May 1651, for example, collier William Tingle hired four men for three years, for which the company would deduct six pence from the price of every load of charcoal Tingle produced.
The Scots were used for a variety of tasks at the plant. John Toish had the job of taking in the stock of ore and charcoal and seeing that each load was of full measure. James Mackall, John Mackshane, and Thomas Tower became forge hands under the tutelage of John Vinton, John Turner, JR, and Henry Leonard and Quentin Pray, respectively. Samuel Hart taught the blacksmith’s trade to John Clarke, at a cost to the company of four pounds. The payment to Hart was unusual, since most training took place at no cost to the company. John Giffard employed John Steward as a servant in his house for two years before putting him out to a blacksmith. James Gourdan became a miner, while James Adams went with Giffard’s cart and team. Most of the Scots hired out to other employees went to colliers, and , since charcoal was the most expensive item in the ironmaking process, the company directed Giffard to employ most of the Scots as full-time woodcutters to supply the colliers. A number of Scots worked on the company’s farm under Daniel Salmon and kept the community’s cattle. The possibility cannot be overlooked that the workers put out to a skilled trade had some background in that field in Scotland.
The employment of the Scots by Giffard met with little approval from the undertakers, who expressed their complaints to him in a letter dated April 26, 1652. “The company would have you to inform them more particularly of the state and condition of there affairs”. they wrote, “as for instance how many Scotts you have in your employment…as also what is become of all the rest that were indisposed over.” They continued that if Giffard had sold half of the Scots sent to him “you should have as yet 30 more remaining at the works to have done your business’s complete that you could not have wants of coming hands nor stock.” They went on to instruct him that “you should have no less then 24 Scots men to cut constantly wood, ” and that the Scots “being placed with other workmen will learn apiece.”
The majority of the Scots resided in a single structure called the “Scotsmen’s house” about a mile from the Lynn plant. Framed by Samuel Bennett, a master carpenter who had built a great part of the iron works, it was , in the words of the undertakers, “very unadvisedly” built on Bennett’s land. As the company refused to pay Bennett, it presumably passed to him in 1654 as partial payment of debts owed him by it. The house probably consisted of two rooms arranged around a central chimney, and had a cellar oven. In 1653 there were twice as many coverlets and blankets, they possibly slept two to a bed. The remaining scots lived with other workers, although one account item refers to the purchase of nails for “the scots cabbins” indicating that the company had other quarters for them as well as the scotsmen’s house.